The Solomon Scandals A Washington newspaper novel by David Rothman

3Sep/100

The Solomon Scandals novel vs. online gossip about Skyline Towers and the intel community

imageThe Solomon Scan­dals is a novel, but two actual events helped inspire it and are the top­ics of online gos­sip today—sev­eral decades later:

The deadly Sky­line Tow­ers build­ing col­lapse in North­ern Vir­ginia, where 14 work­ers died and dozens were injured.

The late Sen. Abra­ham Ribicoff’s secret and ille­gal invest­ment in a CIA-occuped build­ing in Arling­ton.

The com­bined result? The extremely fic­ti­tious Vulture’s Point, a rick­ety high-rise hous­ing some CIA oper­a­tions on the banks of the Potomac, at least sev­eral miles from Skyline.

imageSo what’s invented and what’s fact? Well, in the Con­necti­cut news­pa­pers, I myself revealed Ribicoff’s extremely prob­lem­atic invest­ment, which he claimed was an acci­dent despite his vague­ness about the cir­cum­stances under which he found out about the mis­take. The story made the NBC Nightly News, after I bluffed Ribicoff’s trustee into reveal­ing the senator’s stake in the Key Build­ing in Arling­ton. But my dis­clo­sure  mys­te­ri­ously stayed out of the Wash­ing­ton dailies for rea­son still unknown to me. Adver­tis­ing pres­sure? Friend­ships? A government-press cover-up? Or just an hon­est mis­take in news judg­ment? I don’t know. I cer­tainly had fun con­coct­ing an imag­i­nary con­spir­acy to explain it all.

But you can’t keep a good story—or par­tial story?—down. Now gos­sip is spread­ing online that the actual Sky­line com­plex houses cer­tain secre­tive agen­cies well known for their ini­tials, the very kind of out­fit about which I wrote in Scan­dals. True? Once again, I don’t know. I’d wel­come some authen­tic and ver­i­fi­able infor­ma­tion. What I can say is that I do see a need for intel agen­cies in this era, given that the United States has bun­gled so badly in Iraq and else­where for want of the facts. If I find the rumors pan out, I’ll not pub­lish the exact loca­tions of the intel offices if I dis­cover them and think there is any national secu­rity threat in the information’s becom­ing pub­lic. I’m reach­able via email at davidrothman@pobox.com.

Related: The Wash­ing­ton Post series on Top Secret Amer­ica.

You might also enjoy:
2May/100

Kent State Massacre 40 years later: ‘Get set!’ ‘Point!’ ‘Fire!’ orders said to be in enhanced recording

image Four Kent State Uni­ver­sity students—including Bill Schroeder, an ROTC cadet whose funeral I wrote up for the Lorain Jour­naldied 40 years ago on May 4, 1970. Nine suf­fered bul­let wounds. The Ohio National Guard fired 67 rounds at a crowd no closer than 150 feet. Shot in the back while lying on the grass, young Schroeder him­self was 382 feet from the near­est Guards­man, accord­ing to an offi­cial report. He was not among the anti-Vietnam pro­tes­tors, but rather was sim­ply out­side, between classes.

I fic­tion­al­ized the mas­sacre’s after­math some­what in Chap­ter 29 of The Solomon Scan­dals, but this much is fact, unfor­tu­nately: Through­out Ohio, a small minor­ity rejoiced that young Schroeder and the other three stu­dents were dead. An arson­ist or group of them had burned down the ROTC armory; and prop­erty rights and ide­ol­ogy before human life, no? Pres­i­dent Richard Nixon and Ohio Gov. James Rhodes may or may not have wanted the kids dead, but through rhetoric and mis­han­dling of the Ohio National Guard, pub­lic offi­cials paved the way with bad inten­tions. “They’re worse than the Brown­shirts, and the Com­mu­nist ele­ment, and also the Night Rid­ers, and the vig­i­lantes,” Rhodes said of the pro­tes­tors the day before the killings. “They’re the worst type of peo­ple that we har­bor in Amer­ica.” Was Rhodes at least indi­rectly to blame for the deaths, beyond the fact that he ordered the Guard to Kent State?

“Four Dead in Ohio,” as per­formed by Crosby, Stills and Nash

Did “shoot” orders, impromptu or not, exist? Via the Akron Bea­con Jour­nal and else­where, you can read of a sound record­ing that a Kent State stu­dent named Terry Strubbe made of the inci­dent four decades ago. Yale Uni­ver­sity in 2007 enhanced a dig­i­tal ver­sion, as noted by Al Can­fora, who, as a stu­dent, was injured in the right wrist dur­ing the mas­sacre. He says voices in the record­ing said: “Right here!” and “Get set!” and “Point!” and “Fire!” While not every­one is pos­i­tive about those words and at least one Guards­man directly chal­lenges Can­fora, the New York Times has taken note of the recording’s exis­tence. Espe­cially with dig­i­tal tech­nol­ogy steadily improv­ing, it is time for the Obama admin­is­tra­tion to do the same and reopen the Kent State inves­ti­ga­tions with help from rep­utable tech­nol­o­gists and foren­sics experts.

In The Solomon Scan­dals, a high-rise col­lapses and no one suf­fers any mean­ing­ful pun­ish­ment. The same hap­pened in the real-life Sky­line Plaza dis­as­ter in the Wash­ing­ton area where 14 work­ers died and 34 were injured. Maybe it’s too late for any­body to draw a mur­der con­vic­tion for Kent State; but if noth­ing else, along with the rest of us, Barack Obama could learn from history.

The Inter­net angle: If the record­ing is not on the Inter­net, it needs to be—so techies from all over the world can ana­lyze the sounds. Offi­cial experts could then repli­cate their work if any­thing sig­nif­i­cant turned up.

And a Jew­ish angle: Quite by coin­ci­dence, noth­ing more, three of the four stu­dents killed at Kent State were Jew­ish.

Update, May 8: Mike Mori, the film-maker, has writ­ten in to remind us of the exis­tence of a new DVD of his Emmy-winning doc­u­men­tary, Kent State, The Day the War Came Home. Any TSS read­ers seen it? Your thoughts?

Update, May 11: See New analy­sis of 40-year-old record­ing of Kent State shoot­ings reveals that Ohio Guard was given an order to pre­pare to fire, from the May 9 Cleve­land Plain Dealer.

The PD used impar­tial, inde­pen­dent experts.

You might also enjoy:
3Jan/100

Robert H. Smith death editorial—and the need for the Washington Post to tell the whole story

image image Robert H. Smith, phil­an­thropist and Crys­tal City devel­oper, gets another paean today from the Wash­ing­ton Post—this time an edi­to­r­ial, which fol­lows an obit­u­ary of more than 1,100 words.

The Post appro­pri­ately notes Smith’s dona­tions of “hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars to uni­ver­si­ties, the arts, his­toric sites and civic activities.”

Given his sig­nif­i­cance, then, per­haps the newspaper’s busi­ness desk could treat him as a flesh-and-blood human and also do a bal­anced ret­ro­spec­tive on his busi­ness career. The arti­cle could include at least brief men­tions of the Sky­line high-rise col­lapse and Sen. Abra­ham Ribicoff’s hid­den and appar­ently ille­gal stake in a Smith build­ing occu­pied by the CIA (right photo). Such a busi­ness post mortem could still be over­whelm­ingly positive—I myself believe in cut­ting the dead some slack.

But with all due respect to Robert Smith’s mem­ory, the Post should not repeat the omis­sions of the obit and edi­to­r­ial and leave out facts as pub­lic as the Sky­line col­lapse (a rum­ble heard for miles, 14 work­ers dead and lawsuits).

You might also enjoy:
15Aug/090

From Bob Dylan to D.C.’s white-collar crooks: U.K. music site’s 3,000-word Q&A with David Rothman

Pen­ny­black­mu­sic, a U.K. music site, has just posted a 3,000-word Q&A with David Roth­man. Here’s the start.

pennyblackmusicQandA Can Bob Dylan fit into a Wash­ing­ton novel? Actu­ally yes, if you go by ‘The Solomon Scan­dals’ (Twi­light Times Books).

Inves­tiga­tive reporter Jon Stone loves to swap ‘Dylan albums and pulpy old spy nov­els’ with a friend.

Stone’s fic­tional memoirs—inspired by such real­i­ties as a U.S. senator’s hid­den invest­ment in a CIA-occupied building—are in fact Dylan-sardonic.

In ‘It’s All Good’, Bob Dylan sings, ‘Big politi­cians telling lies/Restaurant kitchen, all full of flies… Build­ings are crum­bling in the neighborhood/But there’s noth­ing to worry about, ’cause it’s all good.’

Sure enough, in jour­nal­ist David Rothman’s new D.C. novel, the Vulture’s Point high-rise on the Potomac River may crum­ble with more than a thou­sand IRS and CIA work­ers inside. Jon Stone’s edi­tor is cronies with the builder Jon wants to expose…

You might also enjoy:
4Jun/090

Budd Schulberg, ‘What Makes Sammy Run?’ and ‘The Solomon Scandals’

Orig­i­nally posted on Aug. 6, 2009. Moved back to play up basics of The Solomon Scan­dals. — D.R.

image RIP, Budd Schul­berg. I hated to see the Wash­ing­ton Post obit blog remind us you’d out­lived your fame. Of course, I was glad you reached 95, but I wish the media and the pub­lic hadn’t been so amnesic. My old paper­back of What Makes Sammy Run? is AWOL, but years later I can still remem­ber not just Sammy the oppor­tunist but also Al Man­heim, the conscience-driven nar­ra­tor, the rabbi’s son from a small New Eng­land town.

Sammy hasn’t the slight­est trou­ble reconciling—in favor of the latter–the fre­quent con­flicts between per­sonal integrity and the Amer­i­can wor­ship of suc­cess. Man­heim is a per­sua­sive con­trast to Sammy.

Man­heim in a town full of Glicks

In The Solomon Scan­dals, itself writ­ten in the first per­son, Jonathan Stone strives to be a Man­heim, a men­sch in a town full of Glicks. This is Wash­ing­ton, not Hol­ly­wood. But the arche­types tran­scend geog­ra­phy and even gen­der. Despite all the cliches about pub­lic ser­vice, D.C., too, is a city of the deal, as shown by char­ac­ters such as Donna Stack­el­baum, a per­versely entre­pre­neur­ial civil ser­vant, an old girl­friend of Stone who ditches him for a Glick­ish young lawyer. Wash­ing­ton has Man­heims, too. But Glicks abound.

Sey­mour Solomon him­self is Glick­ish but far, far smoother about it than Donna or the Schul­berg char­ac­ter. Albeit a for­mer brick­layer with two miss­ing fin­ger­tips, he can be a true gen­tle­man of a crook, espe­cially when talk­ing to Stone about cam­paign dona­tions. “Decency, Jon,” he tells the Spin­oza–quot­ing reporter, “it’s the first thing I look for in a politician.”

Con­tro­versy in the Jew­ish community?

Like What Makes Sammy Run?, Scan­dals may well ignite some con­tro­versy in the Jew­ish com­mu­nity. Sy Solomon is Jew­ish, after all. But then again, like Man­heim, so is Stone, who exposes Solomon despite all the ugly canards about Jew­ish press con­spir­a­cies. You write what you know. Had I been imageEpis­co­palian, my Solomon—or Smyth­son or whatever—would most likely have been spout­ing the related pieties. But then again I can’t envi­sion of Stone him­self as not being Jew­ish. I sus­pect that Schul­berg would have thought the same of Al Man­heim, even if Man­heim him­self hadn’t been a rabbi’s son.

I didn’t agree with Schul­berg on everything—especially his tes­ti­fy­ing before the House Un-American Activ­i­ties Com­mit­tee—but on bal­ance he was clearly far more of a Man­heim than Glick. We’ll also remem­ber him for the Watts Writ­ers Work­shop and for his other notable writ­ings such as his scripts for The Harder They Fall and of course On The Water­front.  Maybe now that he’s dead, Hol­ly­wood will pay him due respect and finally make a movie out of Sammy.

You might also enjoy:
Page 1 of 212