Oil-enriched pols vs. a green Al Gore: New York Times story unfair to ex-VP?
It’s alchemy. Take a middle-class or moderately wealthy politician and send him or her to Washington long enough. Presto! Suddenly his wealth may not be so moderate anymore, thanks to the right friends; and The Solomon Scandals is partly about the golden futures of certain public servants. The latest defense scandals may have arisen from this mindset among insiders.
But sometimes the press can be a little too hard on politicians or at least may employ double standards. Such is the case with a New York Times story by John Broder, about Al Gore. Gore may in fact end up a clean-energy billionaire, given all the money he’s making off the green technology he advocated while in the White House. Oddly, however, the Broder story fails to mention public officials with past, present and future ties to the oil industry, Bush cabinet members included.
I’d rather that more separation exist between public and private business—Broder was right to raise questions. But meanwhile, how about a little consistency, via a few paragraphs about oil–related conflicts of interests? At least, as Gore has noted, he is putting his money where his mouth is.
Photo to right: Gore with Sir David King, a scientist who has advised the British government.
Enjoy this article?
You might also like:
- Al Gore’s ‘scandal’: Sex attack claims from Oregon masseuse are dodgy so far
- Free paper copy of ‘The Solomon Scandals’ if you come up with the best replacement for ‘L Street’ and ‘WaPo’
- The new question: How did the false rape allegations happen against WikiLeaker? Any governments responsible?
- Gore sex probe dropped in Oregon: A NONscandal, without sufficient follow-up in the Washington Post and Politico
- Last hurrah for newspaper movies? ‘State of Play’ opens this week