The Solomon Scandals A Washington newspaper novel by David Rothman

31Dec/090

Robert Smith’s death as the W. Post covered it: Nothing on Skyline or secret Ribicoff investment

image How did the sprawl­ing Crys­tal City com­plex, near Ronald Rea­gan Wash­ing­ton National Air­port, get its name? In the 1960s, devel­oper Robert H. Smith dressed up his first apart­ment build­ing there with a chan­de­lier in the lobby, and soon the name spread to other Smith prop­er­ties. It was, as I see it, a per­fect exam­ple of the Smith family’s mar­ket­ing prowess. Telling details like that enlivened a gen­er­ally excel­lent Wash­ing­ton Post obit­u­ary on Smith, whose father, Charles E. Smith, was a par­tial inspi­ra­tion for the Sey­mour Solomon char­ac­ter in The Solomon Scan­dals. Sim­i­larly the Post obit lav­ished space on the Smith family’s char­i­ta­ble activ­i­ties, exactly as it should have.

imageBut here’s a mys­tery. In more than 1,100 words, why didn’t the obit­u­ary even briefly men­tion the Sky­line Plaza tragedy, which, as a time­line from the Fair­fax County Pub­lic Library shows, was a major event in county his­tory? The Smiths and friends owned the project, and the con­tro­ver­sies over the dis­as­ter were rather pub­lic. Four­teen con­struc­tion work­ers died at Sky­line, and dozens were injured. The Smiths denied respon­si­bil­ity for the col­lapse, and I won’t reach any con­clu­sions here, but, for what it’s worth, Robert Smith was run­ning the con­struc­tion arm of the Smith inter­ests at the time. Not men­tion­ing Sky­line was an injus­tice against the work­ers’ families.

Still, I can appre­ci­ate the pres­sures of space and time, the expla­na­tion kindly given to me by the one of the obit­u­ary writ­ers today. Now I’m root­ing for the obit crew to do a follow-up in the lively and thought­ful Post Mortem blog, given the Smith family’s impor­tance in D.C.-area his­tory and local society.

You might also enjoy:
26Sep/090

D.C.’s power lunchrooms: Then and now

imagejfk The Solomon Scan­dals men­tions the Sans Souci, where so many mem­bers of the D.C. élite plot­ted and dined.

In real life JFK almost surely ate there on occa­sion, and aides such as his press sec­re­tary, Pierre Salinger, most def­i­nitely came.

So did deal­mak­ers and celebri­ties like the late Art Buch­wald, seen in the right photo. A humor colum­nist and Kennedy-family friend, he invested with a real estate mogul who in some ways resem­bled Sy Solomon.

The Sans Souci shows up in Scan­dals’ first chap­ter when George McWilliams, edi­tor of the Wash­ing­ton Telegram, threat­ens to boy­cott the Sans if it won’t honor the wishes of an embit­tered politi­cian and name a baby shark after McWilliams.

image But life and tastes in restau­rant move on. The San Souci is gone from 17th Street, and Ris­torante Tosca is now where many of the highest-priced lob­by­ists and lawyers drink and dine.

You might also enjoy:
29Nov/080

The ACTUAL Telegram?

image A friend and I had just seen a movie with a soft-spoken and obscenity-free edi­tor, a bald­ing Boy Scout of the city room. Now she won­dered if my novel hadn’t sinned in mak­ing such a wild char­ac­ter out of George McWilliams, edi­tor at the fic­ti­tious Wash­ing­ton Telegram. Her mes­sage couldn’t have been clearer. Ben Bradlee, exec­u­tive edi­tor of the Wash­ing­ton Post, would never behave like my Mac.

Some of Bradlee’s ene­mies would emphat­i­cally dis­agree. I won’t take a stand. But here’s the real point: I wasn’t even writ­ing about the Wash­ing­ton Post. I had cre­ated my own Wash­ing­ton, with its own morn­ing news­pa­per. The duty of a nov­el­ist isn’t to report facts but to con­vey basic truths, and ide­ally to enter­tain the reader along the way. By blend­ing in details from dif­fer­ent news­pa­pers, I could write a bet­ter book. Nowa­days, inci­den­tally, Sam Zell lords it over the Chicago Tri­bune and sis­ter news­pa­pers, rides a motor­cy­cle and sup­pos­edly says it’s fine for his peo­ple to watch porn on the job as long as they’re pro­duc­tive. He’s an owner, not an edi­tor, but you get the idea: dif­fer­ent cul­tures sprout up in dif­fer­ent news­rooms or at least dif­fer­ent exec­u­tive suites (no, I’m not accus­ing Trib jour­nal­ists of tak­ing up Zell on his offer!).

At a deeper level, if some­one asks if par­al­lels existed in the 1970s between the Post and the Telegram in the treat­ment of fed­eral land­lords, I’ll plead igno­rance and mean it. I’d love to know why the Post and other local papers didn’t make more out of the rela­tion­ship between Sen. Abra­ham Ribi­coff and Charles Smith, the biggest of the landlords—especially after the NBC evening news spot­lighted Ribicoff’s hid­den invest­ment in a CIA-occupied build­ing through a Smith part­ner­ship. Fear of loss of real estate ads? Or some­thing more innocu­ous? Maybe  a series of over­lap­ping friend­ships existed, mak­ing the Post less curi­ous than it might have been oth­er­wise. Art Buch­wald, the late humor colum­nist and close friend of Bradlee, was even a Smith investor. And David Broder, the polit­i­cal colum­nist, sug­gested Abe Ribi­coff as a vice pres­i­den­tial possibility—-perhaps reflect­ing  some other Post people’s fond­ness for Ribi­coff, which was also abun­dantly evi­dent in the paean of an obit. Last but not least, the Key Build­ing story could sim­ply have been up against the Not Invented Here Syn­drome; per­haps the Post pre­ferred to focus on orig­i­nal sto­ries rather than devote resources to ver­i­fy­ing mine.

Bot­tom line: The Post is not the Telegram, and Bradlee isn’t George McWilliams, who, inci­den­tally, is Brooklyn-born and in many ways is the antithe­sis of a Bradlee-style Boston Brah­min.

Some pos­i­tives about the Old Guard at the Post: Let me also throw in some pos­i­tives about the Bradlee-era at the Post despite my dis­ap­point­ment over the paper’s less-than-complete cov­er­age of Ribicoff-related mat­ters. Not long ago, maybe partly as a way of show­ing it didn’t want to live in the past, the Post painted over a lobby col­lage that included Bradlee and Katharine Gra­ham.  That, I think, may have been a mistake—especially in the era of the Net, when news­pa­pers have to dis­tin­guish them­selves from other media. Say all the nice things you want about the Post’s Slate mag­a­zine, of which I’m a fan, and from which vis­i­tors to the Post will see pages on a high-resolution mon­i­tor in the lobby. But where was Slate dur­ing the fuss over Water­gate and the Pen­ta­gon Papers? Maybe the best solu­tion would be four mon­i­tors in the outer lobby to dis­play not only Slate, Newsweek.com and washingtonpost.com but also scenes from the Post’s past.

Related: Deep Throat is dead—and so are the old rules of inves­tiga­tive jour­nal­ism.

Photo credit: Jack Weir (image released into the pub­lic domain).

You might also enjoy: