The Solomon Scandals A Washington newspaper novel by David Rothman

3Jun/104

Sally Quinn, snobbery and the Mink Stole Ladies Syndrome

image Wash­ing­ton is full of peo­ple telling oth­ers how to live their lives or at least wish­ing they could. Same for the media world. I call it the Mink Stole Ladies Syn­drome, based on a party scene in The Solomon Scan­dals from the D.C. of sev­eral decades ago.

Sally Ster­ling Quinn, with her judg­men­tal dis­sec­tions of social-climbers such as the late Steve Mar­tin­dale, isn’t entirely inno­cent (nor am I, since this post is a bit of a Catch-22).

Hav­ing enter­tained for eons on the George­town party cir­cuit, not to men­tion all her media work, Ms. Quinn prob­a­bly has com­mit­ted her own share of solid-gold gaffes. She might admit to as much. On top of every­thing else, her rela­tions with her stepchil­dren have been Katrina-stormy at times.

But could cri­tiques of Ms. Quinn’s life, in Van­ity Fair, Gawker and else­where, be a lit­tle over the top—complete with Gawker’s high-schoolish head­line, “Sally Quinn Is a Creep”?

imageEven the Van­ity Fair writer, Evge­nia Peretz, acknowl­edges the obvi­ous; yes, Ms. Quinn has been a hyper-dedicated mother toward Quinn Bradlee, who suf­fers from learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties. She could eas­ily have fol­lowed an expert’s advice and have locked him up in an insti­tu­tion, free­ing many thou­sands of extra hours for her jour­nal­ism and enter­tain­ing. On top of that, despite all the time Ms. Peretz must have lav­ished on her highly read­able pro­file of Ms. Quinn, do we know the full story of the soci­ety doyenne’s rela­tions with the stepchil­dren? Fam­i­lies can mys­tify and sur­prise even friends. Con­sider the sep­a­ra­tion of Al and Tip­per Gore. Remem­ber? The Gores’ mar­riage would last for­ever, while the Clin­tons would race to the courts for a divorce  the very nanosec­ond Bill left the White House.

imageI’d also cau­tion the media against the reflex­ive dis­missals of Ms. Quinn as a pure elit­ist snob. There is that side of her, granted, and Sally-haters have even sum­moned upcom­par­i­son between Ms. Quinn and Marie Antoinette, who, like her, glo­ried in the rural life or, as the crit­ics might put it, the syn­thetic rus­tic. But wait. The ulti­mate elit­ist wouldn’t blog for the Wash­ing­ton Post and write party tips for the masses; do you really think Ms. Quinn is the same as Washington’s old cave-dwellers? What’s more, con­sider her enthu­si­as­tic approval of Quinn’s engage­ment to a yoga instruc­tor named Pary Williamson (photo). For all I know, maybe Ms. Williamson is a Vas­sar hon­ors grad­u­ate born to blue-blooded mil­lion­aires. But buried in the Van­ity Fair arti­cle are a few facts that sug­gest oth­er­wise: “While some observers ques­tion Pary’s motives—she seemed to appear out of nowhere and is said to have had a hard­scrab­ble life—those who know her dis­agree. ‘She really is a very upbeat, very exu­ber­ant, sweet, nice per­son and believes in all the spir­i­tual val­ues of yoga and all that stuff,’ says one of her stu­dents. ‘The whole idea of your life lived out in pub­lic is not her style at all.’”

image Let’s decode that, or try to. What does Ms. Peretz mean by “hard­scrab­ble life”? That like most other small-business peo­ple, Ms. Williamson has had to strug­gle? That she might actu­ally come from a mere middle-class back­ground or, gasp, even below? If so, the facts would not jibe very well with the image of Ms. Quinn as an unmit­i­gated snob. Granted, Ms. Williamson is an instruc­tor to such lumi­nar­ies as David Gre­gory, Rahm Emanuel and Katharine Wey­mouth, but who’s to say her con­nec­tions will endure for­ever? Might Sally Quinn’s eager­ness to do the right thing for her son have beaten out snob­bery? Based on what I’ve read, I think so. Quinn Bradlee has writ­ten of his family’s prepa­ra­tions for his life after his elderly par­ents die. If the pub­lic­ity is right—I can’t say—Ms. Williamson will be a part­ner rather than a mere “caretaker.”

While Ms. Quinn’s rela­tions with parts of her extended fam­ily are dys­func­tional in the extreme, I sus­pect that her own imme­di­ate fam­ily, step-children excluded, has been far, far more func­tional than those of many of the crit­ics. Could a lit­tle jeal­ousy be at work here? I won­der after hav­ing read A Dif­fer­ent Life (Quinn’s mem­oirs) and A Life’s Work: Fathers and Sons, a col­lab­o­ra­tion between Ben and Quinn Bradlee, “with obser­va­tions by Sally Quinn.” Father and son love to saw down trees and do other yard work, and Ms. Quinn has bought her own pink model. In fact, the fam­ily acquired a retreat in rural Mary­land because the one in West Vir­ginia was too remote, in case Quinn needed med­ical help for one of his many health prob­lems. Antoinette syn­thetic? Hardly. Tree-work is what Ben Bradlee enjoyed as a boy: “Pop and I worked out in the woods from the begin­ning.” Ms. Quinn rec­og­nized her husband’s love of tree-chopping and learned to feel com­fort­able with a saw. In this case she might as well have been a Wal­mart mom.

imageGoing by some morsels in the Van­ity Fair arti­cle, I’d won­der, too, about Ms. Quinn’s ene­mies por­tray­ing her as a full-strength home-wrecker. The mar­riage may already been doomed. Tony Bradlee “had found Wash­ing­ton jour­nal­ism shal­low,” writes Ms. Peretz, and “was get­ting increas­ingly swept up in the mys­ti­cism of the George Gur­d­ji­eff spir­i­tual move­ment.” By con­trast, accord­ing to Bradlee’s mem­oirs, Sally Quinn “found the all-consuming nature of my involve­ment with the Post nat­ural, even exhil­a­rat­ing.” If Sally Quinn hadn’t appeared, might another woman? I’m not con­don­ing Bradlee’s tim­ing. But it’s his life, and I find it end­lessly baf­fling how peo­ple ded­i­cated to the right of cor­po­ra­tions to foul the Gulf of Mexico—or at least try to lobby away the reg­u­la­tory apparatus—would want to dic­tate their “moral­ity” to Bradlee and wife.

Sim­ply put, although I’d never con­fuse Sally Quinn with Mother Teresa, it’s time for some tolerance.

imageAma­zon mys­tery: As of this writ­ing, I don’t see a sin­gle cus­tomer review of A Life’s Work (rank 28,940 in Books) on Amazon—rather strange, given Sally Quinn’s stature in the media. Part of the rea­son could be that Quinn Bradlee’s mem­oirs have already scooped the new book and more directly address the needs of par­ents of chil­dren with learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties. Another could be what oth­ers have already noted—the dueling-weddings con­tro­versy. Still another could be that A Life’s Work is so full of inti­mate details that out­siders might feel they are tres­pass­ing, espe­cially if they believe they can­not be com­pletely lauda­tory. I’d rate Work four out of five stars. The book has its flaws but is worth read­ing if you want between-the-lines knowl­edge of the ways of cer­tain mem­bers of the Post media élite. Ditto—as in the case of A Dif­fer­ent Life—if you’re the par­ent of a child with learn­ing disabilities.

You might also enjoy:
24Feb/100

Sally Quinn’s ‘Party’ column dropped from print: Shades of LBJ’s Hoover surprise for her husband?

image LBJ was about to replace J. Edgar Hoover as FBI direc­tor when word leaked to Newsweek. So what did the White House do to spite the Ben Bradlee, then at Newsweek’s Wash­ing­ton bureau? Reap­point Hoover, of course.

Now the reverse has hap­pened in a sense to Sally Quinn, Bradlee’s wife and doyenne of the George­town party cir­cuit, in the wake of her con­tro­ver­sial writeup of a wed­ding gaffe.

Con­trary to com­mon expec­ta­tions, includ­ing mine, based on Ms. Quinn’s tight friend­ship with the own­ers of the Post, she lost her “Party” column—or at least the ver­sion that counts on L Street, the print incarnation.

With rare excep­tions, she’ll “Party” on just in cyber­space. And the col­umn must “return to what had been its orig­i­nal focus on faith, fam­ily and enter­tain­ing.” As reported by Erik Wem­ple at the Wash­ing­ton City Paper, that’s the word directly from Post Exec­u­tive Edi­tor Mar­cus Brauchli. The Hoover parallel—my lit­tle twist—is appro­pri­ate given Sally Quinn’s stand­ing as a Wash­ing­ton insti­tu­tion just like Hoover. No spite-the-prophets fac­tor, per­haps. But a sur­prise just the same.

You might also enjoy:
22Feb/100

Sally Quinn wedding feud: Don’t fire Ms. Quinn — turn her ‘at large’

image My “Don’t fire” head­line is for the ben­e­fit of out-of-towners.

As a close friend of the Gra­hams, the own­ing fam­ily of the Wash­ing­ton Post, she in fact comes wrapped in asbestos.

So why am I writ­ing this gen­er­ally pro-Quinn post (amid the “duel­ing wed­dings” con­tro­versy—over the com­mon date of April 10, shared by her son’s wed­ding and the pre­vi­ously planned one for Ben Bradlee’s grand­daugh­ter)?

No, I don’t know Sally Quinn. And I’m baf­fled how the author of The Party could com­mit such a gaffe and spread the bad feel­ings in print. Even if her expla­na­tion might hold up—wedding plan­ners are hardly beyond the reach of Murphy’s Law—I winced when I read there wasn’t a dan­ger of an over­lap in hoped-for atten­dees. Grand­fa­thers don’t count when the bride-to-be is the first­born of ten grand­chil­dren? And when she clearly and dearly wants Ben Bradlee to come? Should the National Cathedral’s avail­abil­ity on X Day count more than a grand­daugh­ter? What a fine exam­ple of respectabil­ity as the enemy of decency.

But, and this is a big one, let’s remem­ber the famous quote attrib­uted to the late Phil Gra­ham: jour­nal­ism is “the first draft of his­tory.” Fur­ther­more, it can also be in a sense the first draft of lit­er­a­ture. When F. Scott Fitzger­ald cre­ated Jay Gatsby, he may have relied in part on news­pa­per clip­pings or at least a clip. As both a jour­nal­ist and a nov­el­ist, I myself would be grumpy if the Post nudged Ms. Quinn into retire­ment before she absolutely had to go. Talk about insti­tu­tional mem­o­ries and promis­ing “first drafts”!

Even her crit­ics tend to con­cede that Ms. Quinn is the doyenne of the George­town party cir­cuit. How often do you get the word—in your morn­ing paper—directly from an authen­tic doyenne? If any­thing, the Post should give her an “at large” col­umn, with a spe­cial man­date to do what she did at the start of her career. A lit­tle less eti­quette advice, please, and more of the old Sally’s anthro­po­log­i­cal candor.

You might also enjoy:
22Feb/100

The Sally Quinn post

It should be online by 7 p.m. East­ern tonight, and, yes, it’s mostly sym­pa­thetic toward her. I’ll make my case in detail.

Update, 6:45 p.m.: Here’s the promised post.

You might also enjoy:
20Feb/100

Rexwood Garst and the darker side of ‘meritocracy’ in journalism, politics and other fields

image In The Solomon Scan­dals, I have a lit­tle fun with a hyper­spe­cial­ized Yalie named Rex­wood Garst, a reporter at a Wash­ing­ton Post-type newspaper.

“Serbo-Croatian,” says this young resume jock who lives in a con­verted car­riage house in George­town, “that’s the key. I know how to speak it.” It all jibes with my sug­ges­tion that the real-life Post become less aloof and start car­ing more about project man­agers and teach­ers and a lit­tle less about an élite Slate–style audi­ence. Slate can be a delight; the Post newspaper’s fix­a­tion on “upscale” is not. Sol­vency ahead of snob­bery, please—including the mer­i­to­cratic kind.

Now David Brooks (Uni­ver­sity of Chicago, ‘83) has weighed in with the sen­si­ble opin­ion that “con­text,” not just aca­d­e­mic and tech­ni­cal creds, should mat­ter. In fields such as jour­nal­ism, pol­i­tics and bank­ing, says the New York York Times colum­nist, traits like com­pas­sion and decency are los­ing out too often among Ivy-educated meritocrats.

Result? More scan­dals, fewer effec­tive orga­ni­za­tions. “The tal­ent level is higher, but the rep­u­ta­tion is lower.”

Hear, hear! For decades, James Fal­lows has warned against “cre­den­tial­ism,” and it’s good to see Brooks writ­ing in a sim­i­lar vein. Class dif­fer­ences fig­ure promi­nently in The Solomon Scan­dals, which depicts Wash­ing­ton as it is: a white-collar fac­tory town.

Brooks him­self notes that social gaps are widen­ing, as bankers marry other bankers rather than, say, sec­re­taries. Noth­ing against such banker-to-banker trans­ac­tions; but could intra-class mar­riage now be too com­mon? And are we afflicted with too much credentialism?

Speak­ing of the Post: In the next few days, I’ll run an item on Quinn Bradlee, son of ex-editor Ben Bradlee and his wife, Sally Quinn, the colum­nist. No, it won’t at all be like the oth­ers you’ve read about young Quinn’s forth­com­ing mar­riage to Pary Williamson. Check back in on Mon­day or Tues­day. Mean­while, from afar—since I don’t know the Bradlee fam­ily or the bride-to-be’s—congratulations to Quinn and Pary.

Image of Yale com­mence­ment: CC-licensed photo from Pol­davo.

You might also enjoy:
Page 1 of 212